Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, clone human beings has recently become a conjecture that seems very much more feasible in todays society. The word clone has been utilise to cells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells stemming from a individual(a) cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone be identical in their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for any differences caused by mutation. similar twins, for example, who stand up by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from devil separate fertilized eggs, are not clones. (Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia). thither are two known ways that we can clone domain. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second rule of clone a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that circumstance person. With these two methods at our desposal, we must ask ourselves two very important questions Should we do this, and Can we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and respectable sides of this skip will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, provided the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that society could actually experience. Todays technological speed has brought us to the piont to where almost anything is possible. Sarah B. Tegen, 97 MIT Biology Undergraduate President states, "I conceptualize the cloning of an entire mammal has shown me exactly how fast biology is moving ahead, I had no idea we were so close to this kind of accomplishment." Based on the up-to-the-minute science , though, most of these dreams and fears are premature, say some MIT biologists. Many biologist claim that true human cloning is something still far in the future. This raises ethical questions now as towhether or not human cloning should even be seeked. (http//www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). There are many problems with cloning humans. angiotensin converting enzyme method of human cloning is splitting embryos... ...ill this experiment be used to create a new race of human clones? I personally count that human cloning to any extent will be at least problematic. I think nature will put up a sizeable fight against mans feable intrusion into the creation business. As I have mentioned before in the movie The Boys from Brazil, man can only screw-up any attempt at creation. Just ask Dr. Frankenstein. Who knows what kind of mutations cloning would breed. Biologically would a clone evolve faster, slower? Would it affectively wipe out gene diversity do humans susectable to disease? Could a common cold be the new plauge? These are questions I hope we will never have to answer. Bibliography Works Cited "Clone," Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia. 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation. all(a) rights reserved. Macklin, Ruth. "Human cloning? Dont just say no" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-26-98) Martin, Robert. "Creating a Soul by Cloning?" utilize Christianity. 1998 (http//www.user.shentel.net/ramartin/applied/cloning.htm) (4-26-98) ROSS, SONYA "President ruling out federal research on human cloning" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-27-98) Cloning rise -- essays research papers fc Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible in todays society. The word clone has been applied to cells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells stemming from a single cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone are identical in their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for any differences caused by mutation. Identical twins, for example, who originate by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from two separate fertilized eggs, are not clones. (Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia). There are two known ways that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods at our desposal, we must ask ourselves two very important questions Should we do this, and Can we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and ethical sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that society could actually experience. Todays technological speed has brought us to the piont to where almost anything is possible. Sarah B. Tegen, 97 MIT Biology Undergraduate President states, "I think the cloning of an entire mammal has shown me exactly how fast biology is moving ahead, I had no idea we were so close to this kind of accomplishment." Based on the current science , though, most of these dreams and fears are premature, say some MIT biologists. Many biologist claim that true human cloning is something still far in the future. This raises ethical questions now as towhether or not human cloning should even be attempted . (http//www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). There are many problems with cloning humans. One method of human cloning is splitting embryos... ...ill this experiment be used to create a new race of human clones? I personally think that human cloning to any extent will be at least problematic. I think nature will put up a good fight against mans feable intrusion into the creation business. As I have mentioned before in the movie The Boys from Brazil, man can only screw-up any attempt at creation. Just ask Dr. Frankenstein. Who knows what kind of mutations cloning would breed. Biologically would a clone evolve faster, slower? Would it affectively wipe out gene diversity making humans susectable to disease? Could a common cold be the new plauge? These are questions I hope we will never have to answer. Bibliography Works Cited "Clone," Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia. 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Macklin, Ruth. "Human cloning? Dont just say no" U.S . News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-26-98) Martin, Robert. "Creating a Soul by Cloning?" Applied Christianity. 1998 (http//www.user.shentel.net/ramartin/applied/cloning.htm) (4-26-98) ROSS, SONYA "President ruling out federal research on human cloning" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-27-98)