Cloning Essay -- essays research papers fc

Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, clone human beingss has recently become a fortuity that seems ofttimes more feasible in todays society. The word clone has been utilize to carrells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells stemming from a undivided cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone atomic number 18 identical in their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for any differences caused by mutation. very(a) twins, for example, who turn by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from both separate fertilized eggs, are not clones. (Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia). at that place are two known ways that we can clone serviceman. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second manner of copy a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular proposition person. With these two methods at our desposal, we must ask ourselves two very important questions Should we do this, and Can we? There is no doubt that many problems involving the technological and estimable sides of this solution will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, moreover the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but neer as a concept that society could actually experience. Todays technological speed has brought us to the piont to where almost anything is possible. Sarah B. Tegen, 97 MIT Biology Undergraduate President states, "I find the cloning of an entire mammal has shown me exactly how fast biology is moving ahead, I had no idea we were so close to this kind of accomplishment." Based on the occurrent science , though, most of these dreams and fears are premature, say some MIT biologists. Many biologist claim that true human cloning is something still far in the future. This raises safe questions now as towhether or not human cloning should even be exploited. (http//www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). There are many problems with cloning humans. atomic number 53 method of human cloning is splitting embryos... ...ill this experiment be used to create a new race of human clones? I personally speak up that human cloning to any extent will be at least problematic. I think nature will put up a good fight against mans feable intrusion into the creation business. As I have mentioned before in the movie The Boys from Brazil, man can only screw-up any attempt at creation. Just ask Dr. Frankenstein. Who knows what kind of mutations cloning would breed. Biologically would a clone evolve faster, slower? Would it affectively wipe out gene diversity fashioning humans susectable to disease? Could a common cold be the new plauge? These are questions I hope we will never have to answer. Bibliography Works Cited "Clone," Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia. 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation. whole rights reserved. Macklin, Ruth. "Human cloning? Dont just say no" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-26-98) Martin, Robert. "Creating a Soul by Cloning?" utilise Christianity. 1998 (http//www.user.shentel.net/ramartin/applied/cloning.htm) (4-26-98) ROSS, SONYA "President ruling out federal research on human cloning" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-27-98) Cloning try -- essays research papers fc Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible in todays society. The word clone has been applied to cells as well as to organis ms, so that a group of cells stemming from a single cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone are identical in their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for any differences caused by mutation. Identical twins, for example, who originate by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from two separate fertilized eggs, are not clones. (Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia). There are two known ways that we can clone humans. The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo. The second method of cloning a human involves taking cells from an already existing human being and cloning them, in turn creating other individuals that are identical to that particular person. With these two methods at our desposal, we must ask ourselves two very important questions Should we do this, and Can we? There is no doubt that many problems involvi ng the technological and ethical sides of this issue will arise and will be virtually impossible to avoid, but the overall idea of cloning humans is one that we should accept as a possible reality for the future. Cloning humans is an idea that has always been thought of as something that could be found in science fiction novels, but never as a concept that society could actually experience. Todays technological speed has brought us to the piont to where almost anything is possible. Sarah B. Tegen, 97 MIT Biology Undergraduate President states, "I think the cloning of an entire mammal has shown me exactly how fast biology is moving ahead, I had no idea we were so close to this kind of accomplishment." Based on the current science , though, most of these dreams and fears are premature, say some MIT biologists. Many biologist claim that true human cloning is something still far in the future. This raises ethical questions now as towhether or not human cloning should even be att empted. (http//www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). There are many problems with cloning humans. One method of human cloning is splitting embryos... ...ill this experiment be used to create a new race of human clones? I personally think that human cloning to any extent will be at least problematic. I think nature will put up a good fight against mans feable intrusion into the creation business. As I have mentioned before in the movie The Boys from Brazil, man can only screw-up any attempt at creation. Just ask Dr. Frankenstein. Who knows what kind of mutations cloning would breed. Biologically would a clone evolve faster, slower? Would it affectively wipe out gene diversity making humans susectable to disease? Could a common cold be the new plauge? These are questions I hope we will never have to answer. Bibliography Works Cited "Clone," Microsoft Encarta 97 Encyclopedia. 1993-1996 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Macklin, Ruth. "Human cloning? Dont just say no&qu ot U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-26-98) Martin, Robert. "Creating a Soul by Cloning?" Applied Christianity. 1998 (http//www.user.shentel.net/ramartin/applied/cloning.htm) (4-26-98) ROSS, SONYA "President ruling out federal research on human cloning" U.S. News and World Report. 3 March 1997 (4-27-98)